Review of ATC’s Production of Lost in Yonkersby Marc HansenATC’s marvelous production of the classic play Lost in Yonkers is possibly the best play they’ve produced in the last two years. Written by playwright genius Neil Simon (The Odd Couple), for which he won the Pulitzer Prize, Lost in Yonkers is Simon’s magnum opus, containing his wittiest, most hysterical dialogue combined with the surprising emotional impact the play unleashes on you. It may be the least flashy ATC play this year in terms of lighting or set design, but it excels in theatre’s two most important aspects: acting and writing.Lost in Yonkers starts out in Grandma Kurnitz’s living room, where two young brothers, Arty (Maxx Carlisle-King) and Jay (Ryan DeLuca), recount horror stories they’ve heard about their strict, paternal grandmother (Judy Kaye) that they hardly know. This is the living room that the rest of the play will be set in and that we’ll come to know so well. And though the play begins with an almost sitcom-y premise where the two mischevious youngsters are forced to live with their overbearing grandma for nearly a year, while their father (Spencer Rowe) travels around the country, the play takes a rather unexpected turn. Being a comedy, and a Neil Simon comedy, I naturally expected the children to eventually come to terms with their demanding immigrant grandmother and realize how much they love and appreciate her in the end, in a very predictable fashion. And though this ultimately does happen in a way (albeit much slower and more realistic than typical ‘90s comedies), the play slowly becomes more about the dysfunctional relationships Grandma’s Kurnitz and her own children have. As the mentally challenged aunt (Kate Goehring) and smooth criminal uncle (Preston Maybank) of the boys start to play a larger role, we realize that Lost in Yonkers isn’t about the boys. The boys, in fact, represent the audience, watching all the drama unfold upon them.Obviously, the biggest reason Lost in Yonkers is so successful is because of Neil Simon’s book. It’s not only full of his very clever, very funny writing, that I was well aware of after reading The Odd Couple, but includes a really profound, emotional center at the heart of the story that wasn’t as present in the cheeky Odd Couple. Yonkers is really phenomenal writing on all fronts, with extremely deep, well rounded characters pushing the engaging story forward. At first, I thought Grandma Kurnitz was just your typical stereotypical strict authority figure, but as the play went on, I realized what an incredibly complex character she was and Bella, the retarded aunt, is the best written handicapped character I’ve ever seen. She may have disabilities, but that doesn’t mean she doesn’t have intense, conflicting feelings and desires that emerge pass the surface of her illness.The characters obviously wouldn’t work without the proper cast though, which is why it’s so amazing that Lost in Yonkers literally perfectly casted every character. Goehring as Bella is obviously the stand out, in the best portrayal of a mentally handicapped character I’ve ever seen. But to say that Bella is just a ‘mentally handicapped’ character isn’t doing the character justice, as she is so much more than that, which is what I love about the performance. Goehring lets that come through very naturally, but she plays Bella as a deeply confused, hurt, and sheltered little child in a grown woman’s body, with a grown woman’s desires, yet the naivety to think that that life is possible for her. It’s very hard to pick a favorite among such a great cast though. Maybank as Louie is so cool and suave and badass that you completely see why the young boys would admire and look up to him, yet he’s also intimidating and scary enough that you’re simultaneously scared of his next move or the trouble he might bring. In his small role as the father, Rowe completely convinces you in the play’s first pitch, understanding how conflicted this caring father is about leaving his children behind, that the set up doesn’t seem at all like a gimmick. Kerry McCue, in another small role as Aunt Gert, is incredibly funny with her vocal timing and even DeLuca and Carlisle-King as the boys had great comedic chops. But I can’t forget Kaye as Grandma Kurnitz who feels like your lovable, grouchy, old grandma and propels her into more than just than an one-note character. Such great acting and execution can only happen at the tips of great direction though, which is why the stupendous work of ATC’s very own Samantha Wyer can’t be forgotten.Yes, perhaps the production isn’t perfect. Some extensive dialogue scenes start to feel a little long and maybe a score would’ve helped, but I prefer not to nitpick when everything else is so wonderful. Lost in Yonkers isn’t a theatre, or art, experience that you get to experience often, so why not appreciate it while you can?Grade: A
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
"Lost in Yonkers" Review
Saturday, February 19, 2011
"Ten Chimneys" Review
Review of ATC’s Production of Ten Chimneys
by Marc Hansen
The world premiere of Ten Chimneys, the newest production playing at the ATC, is a delightful, amusing little comedy about actors’ drama behind the stage.
The play follows the renowned husband and wife team of real Broadway stars Alfred Lunt (Steve Hendrickson) and Lynn Fontanne (Suzanne Bouchard) in 1938, as they decide to perform Anton Chekhov’s masterpiece, The Seagull, for their next production. They retreat to their legendary and gigantic Wisconsin mansion to rehearse, bringing their fellow actors and extended family. Quirky family hijinks ensue, as well as a blossoming love triangle between Lunt, Fontanne, and their young, new lead actress Uta Hagen. On top of all this, the behind-the-scenes drama in Ten Chimneys directly correlates with the drama in the play they’re rehearsing (which is also about actors). Gee, how coincidental.
A lot of praise should be heaped upon writer Jeffrey Hatcher for not only writing an intelligent and complicated script, but for making it play out so simply (as well as props to director David Ira Goldstein for providing that seamless flow). Ten Chimneys has a rather complex written premise (with all the play-within-a-play nonsense), which though an attraction to me, may drive a lot of people away. However, though playfully clever (sometimes even coming across as too impressed with its own cleverness), the play never seems overly complicated. It’s smart, but still incredibly entertaining and interesting. In fact, the play-within-the-play plot point isn’t even necessary, though it does reinforce that age old theatre theme that life is a stage.
The cast is all fantastic. Hendrickson stands out as nailing the flamboyant character of Alfred Lunt, but then I think about how perfectly Bouchard played Fontanne’s materialistic Broadway diva star or the unexpected emotion Michael Winters brought to the character of Sydney Greenstreet, and it becomes much harder to pick a favorite. Sure, the characters are stereotypes of traditional family and actor roles (Lunt’s extravagance, Fontanne’s prima donna, or Linda Stephens as the lovably bitchy mother), but it all works in the play’s favor. Instead of feeling cliché, it simply feels familiar. Immediately you know these characters and it starts to feel like your own family.
The production values are all excellent and greatly enhance the play. The rotating set is captivating and the lush, green “trees” really made me feel like I was in Wisconsin. In fact, the prop and scenery pieces were replicated from photos of actual items found at Ten Chimneys and the cast actually got to rehearse for a week in the legendary estate. It’s this attention to detail, though not obvious, that adds such an authentic feel to the production.
However, the play does have its flaws. For one, the play is a little too play-centric for its own good. Of course, it’s no surprise that a plot like this would elicit a favorable response among the thespians that put on this show, but sometimes it felt like there were a few too many “inside jokes.” I had no idea until I researched the production afterwards that Lunt and Fontanne were real Broadway stars, and though that only made the play cooler, there were times within the play that I felt a little lost when they were extensively dealing with The Seagull production. Some would argue that that’s fine and that a prerequisite knowledge of The Seagull is simply necessary, but I think there are more people who know nothing of The Seagull than people who do, even among the theatre buffs that frequently attend the ATC’s productions.
It’s also a little lightweight. It’s fun and entertaining, but after the show’s over it doesn’t feel all that memorable, unlike the productions Lunt and Fontanne put on themselves. It’s about what actors are like behind the scenes, but this doesn’t feel like a very meaningful theme. However that doesn’t seem to be what Ten Chimneys is concerned with. No, Ten Chimneys is just a play about people who love theatre and its main purpose is putting on a great show.
Grade: B+
Saturday, January 1, 2011
New Year's Resolutions

Friday, December 31, 2010
2010: A Year in Review
Saturday, December 11, 2010
Thursday, December 9, 2010
"Woody Guthrie's American Song" Review
Review of ATC’s Production of Woody Guthrie’s American Song
by Marc Hansen
If you’re the kind of person who loves traditional folk/country music, then I’m sure you would LOVE ATC’s production of Woody Guthrie’s American Song, as most of the production consists of pretty much just that. As someone who loves modern folk music, but isn’t particularly a fan of this style, I admire the play for its strengths, but overall it just isn’t the play for me.
Woody Guthrie’s American Song brings to mind last season’s Ain’t Misbehavin’, which coincidentally had the time slot as Woody Guthrie’s American Song this year. Like Ain’t Misbehavin’, Woody Guthrie takes a famous, defining musical artist in a given genre (Woody Guthrie of Depression-era folk, like Fats Waller of 1920s jazz) and performs a wide collection of their songs over the course of the play. The productions consists of mostly just that, though you also get a great atmosphere for the time period they’re trying to project.
The main difference with Woody Guthrie however, is that Ain’t Misbehavin’ was just Fats Waller songs, while Woody Guthrie actually tries to provide a plot within the play. That’s not exactly a bad thing, in theory; I was expecting the production to be a story about Woody Guthrie’s life, but as the play goes on, you become increasingly aware that it’s more about the music, with an underdeveloped story thrown in occasionally between songs. In addition, the story that’s there, maybe because it is so underdeveloped, isn’t captivating in the slightest. It’s dull and just plain confusing. I think you could certainly make at least a semi-interesting story about Woody Guthrie’s life, but this isn’t it. It’s especially brought down by the fact that the five actors in the cast constantly switch characters, which isn’t unusual for secondary characters, but even the main character of Woody Guthrie was juggled between the three male stars, all at various points in the play. This convoluted approach, I’m assuming trying to be unique or creative, just made me bewildered as to who was who and what was happening.
On the positive side, as I said earlier, the play really is more concerned with the music than the plot, and the music is great. Even for someone like me, whose particular taste doesn’t lean towards this style of music (I actually prefer the 1920s jazz of Ain’t Misbehavin’), I can’t deny that the music is great and is the production’s greatest strength. There is a reason Woody Guthrie was a defining artist of this genre, and by the time his magnum opus “This Land Is Your Land” closed the show, everyone in the audience was singing along. The three band members (Mark Baczynski, David P. Jackson, and David Miles Keenan) are all excellent multi-instrumentalists and I loved the opening number “Hard Travelin’” in which every cast member overlaps a monologue about their characters’ backstory.
The set was also fantastic, extravagantly large and vast, just like the Old West, (heightened by our balcony seating) and perfectly setting the tone and mood for the music that accompanies it. You truly have a sense of the time and place of Depression-era America. When it comes down to it, even with its pros and cons, how much you like Woody Guthrie’s American Song will be directly related to how much you like his music. If you despise it, you may not be able to appreciate the set’s beauty or the instrumentalists’ skill. And if you’re head over heels in love with old time country/folk music, you may be able to look past that horrendous attempt at a story. As for me, I found myself somewhere in the middle.
Overall Grade: B-
Saturday, November 6, 2010
"Ma Rainey's Black Bottom" Review
Review of ATC’s Production of Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom
by Marc Hansen
In his career, prestigious playwright and legend August Wilson wrote, in addition to others, a series of ten plays, each detailing the African-American experience of one of the decades in the 20th century. These were called his “Century Cycle” or his “Pittsburgh Cycle,” as all ten of these plays were set in Pittsburgh’s Hill District, with the exception of one: Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom, which takes place in Chicago and has now come to Tucson, Arizona at the ATC. This time the ATC keeps it light on the elaborate sets (though the one set they do have is still well done), and mostly relies on Wilson’s fabulous script and a superb cast to make for another enjoyable experience.
Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom takes place over the course of one day in 1927, in a recording studio in Chicago, Illinois. The four struggling band members, the stubborn old record producer (Michael Tezla), and Ma Rainey’s peace keeping manager (Phil Kilbourne) are waiting for legendary singer Ma Rainey to arrive and record her new jazz record. After coming an hour late, major pop diva Ma Rainey (Jevetta Steele) refuses to sing until she has her Coca Cola and demands that her stuttering nephew (Ahanti Young) speak a line in the title song (“Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom”). Meanwhile, back in the rehearsal room, feuds between the cocky, young trumpet player Levee (James T. Alfred) and the other three goofball musicians arise, ultimately leading to dire consequences and expressing the hardships of black Americans in the 1920s.
The best thing about the play was Wilson’s extraordinary and well-thought out dialogue, which had a poetic rhythm to it and reveled in the possibilities of the English language. It’s one of those screenplays that I would love to read on its own and get the full nuances of the arrangements of the words. I loved the banter back and forth between the back up band members, which is only heightened by all four actor’s extremely natural, yet completely convincing, performances (Abdul Salaam Razzac as Toledo is the most lovable of the three misfits, though all three are equally hilarious). Although, at some points, Ma Rainey does get a little too talky for its own good. Consisting of almost all dialogue, it’s easy to get lost and lose focus, and overall the play could use some more action to balance out the important themes the actors do express in their lines.
The play definitely picks up in the second half, after Ma Rainey has entered the picture and we get to watch a performance or two of some of the songs. (Warning to some members of the audience: Though this is a play very much about music and musicians, it’s not a musical; Don’t go in expecting Dreamgirls or lots of bluesy songs, as many members seemed to be disappointed by a lack of this - it is instead an intense and powerful portrait of African-Americans in the ‘20s). Jevetta Steele, in particular, is stellar and has a very commanding stage presence. She nails the arrogant, pop diva act and when she’s on stage, you can’t take your eyes off her. The MVP of the cast though is by far James T. Alfred as Levee, which is truly saying something as I actually admired every performance. However Alfred won me over when at the end of the first act, after having his character play the role of the arrogant and ambitious up-and-comer, Alfred reveals Levee’s true self when erupting into a towering monologue, truly showing how troubled, damaged and hot-tempered Levee really is.
Once again, the production isn’t perfect, as it does get a little slow and too long at various points, but all in all through Wilson’s mostly tight script, and the even better realized performances from this production of Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom, ATC certainly creates an emotional experience in which you empathize and understand the actions of these fascinating characters.
Overall Grade: B+